Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems
Shortcuts: COM:AN/U • COM:ANU • COM:ANI
|
This is a place where users can communicate with administrators, or administrators with one another. You can report vandalism, problematic users, or anything else that needs an administrator's intervention. Do not report child pornography or other potentially illegal content here; e-mail legal-reports | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Vandalism [] |
User problems [] |
Blocks and protections [] |
Other [] |
|
Report users for clear cases of vandalism. Block requests for any other reason should be reported to the blocks and protections noticeboard.
|
Report disputes with users that require administrator assistance. Further steps are listed at resolve disputes.
|
Reports that do not suit the vandalism noticeboard may be reported here. Requests for page protection/unprotection could also be requested here.
|
Other reports that require administrator assistance which do not fit in any of the previous three noticeboards may be reported here. Requests for history merging or splitting should be filed at COM:HMS. |
| Archives | |||
127, 126, 125, 124, 123, 122, 121, 120, 119, 118, 117, 116, 115, 114, 113, 112, 111, 110, 109, 108, 107, 106, 105, 104, 103, 102, 101, 100, 99, 98, 97, 96, 95, 94, 93, 92, 91, 90, 89, 88, 87, 86, 85, 84, 83, 82, 81, 80, 79, 78, 77, 76, 75, 74, 73, 72, 71, 70, 69, 68, 67, 66, 65, 64, 63, 62, 61, 60, 59, 58, 57, 56, 55, 54, 53, 52, 51, 50, 49, 48, 47, 46, 45, 44, 43, 42, 41, 40, 39, 38, 37, 36, 35, 34, 33, 32, 31, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1 |
103, 102, 101, 100, 99, 98, 97, 96, 95, 94, 93, 92, 91, 90, 89, 88, 87, 86, 85, 84, 83, 82, 81, 80, 79, 78, 77, 76, 75, 74, 73, 72, 71, 70, 69, 68, 67, 66, 65, 64, 63, 62, 61, 60, 59, 58, 57, 56, 55, 54, 53, 52, 51, 50, 49, 48, 47, 46, 45, 44, 43, 42, 41, 40, 39, 38, 37, 36, 35, 34, 33, 32, 31, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1
| ||
Note
- Before reporting one or more users here, try to resolve the dispute by discussing with them first. (Exception: obvious vandal accounts, spambots, etc.)
- Keep your report as short as possible, but include links as evidence.
- Remember to sign and date all comments using four tildes (
~~~~), which translates into a signature and a time stamp. - Notify the user(s) concerned via their user talk page(s).
{{subst:Discussion-notice|noticeboard=COM:AN/U|thread=|reason=}} ~~~~is available for this. - It is important to keep a cool head, especially when responding to comments against you or your edits. Personal attacks and disruptive comments only escalate a situation; Please try to remain civil with your comments.
- Administrators: Please make a note if a report is dealt with, to avoid unnecessary responses by other admins.
User:Esperantoemilio
[edit]- Esperantoemilio (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)
After receiving the final copyvio warning, this user didn't stop uploading same unfree portrait; File:Princehisahito2508.jpg, File:Princehisahito2025.jpg, File:Princehisahitoofjapan.jpg and File:Princehisahito19yrs.jpg . Netora (talk) 08:40, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
Done Blocked for a week, all files tagged or deleted. Yann (talk) 08:46, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
- 日本守 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)
- Suspicious sock. This user uploads the same copyvio photo without license information. Netora (talk) 13:13, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
- Yumi48 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)
- New sock continues uploading same copyvio portrait. File:8月17日、東京・元赤坂の赤坂東邸で.jpg Netora (talk) 15:17, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
- For the record, I opened Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Esperantoemilio due to the sock allegations. Regards, Grand-Duc (talk) 16:27, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
- Indef-blocked Yumi48. - Jmabel ! talk 21:35, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
- @Yann: do you have any reason not to give Esperantoemilio a longer, or indef, block? Seems to me like this block evasion merits it. - Jmabel ! talk 21:37, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
- @Jmabel, CU evidence linking Esperantoemilio to the other two accounts was inconclusive, so any block/reblock would need to be based on behavioral evidence/copyvio issues only. In light of this user uploading copyright violations for 7 years with ample warnings but no edits to their talk page, I'm inclined to indef due to lack of communication. If they want an unblock, they need to start communicating. All the Best -- Chuck Talk 04:52, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
- @Jmabel: One week block is usual for first block for copyright violations. Now if this user is abusing multiple accounts, that is a valid reason for an indefinite block. Yann (talk) 11:30, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Another Namest 2003 sock
[edit]- Zaragoza, La Ciudad De Las Dos Catedrales (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information))
- Category:Sockpuppets of Namest 2003
Seems quite blatant given the username. Further evidence from User:SteinsplitterBot/Previously deleted files below:
| Timestamp | File | Uploader | Deleted file | Uploader |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 29 2025 04:51 PM | File:Escudo-humillación.png |
Zaragoza, La Ciudad De Las Dos Catedrales (talk | contr | dcontr | accounts | blocks | 1 edits) | File:Escudo-humillación.png (Und | Log) | Zaragoza, Aquí y Ahora (talk | contr | dcontr | accounts | blocks)(different) |
Jonteemil (talk) 23:38, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
Already done Already globally locked. Yann (talk) 21:22, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
User:Wiki 777000
[edit]- Wiki 777000 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)
continued uploading non-free content and blindly marking them with CC licenses. 0x0a (talk) 22:31, 30 December 2025 (UTC)
Done Blocked for 6 months (3rd block). Yann (talk) 21:24, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
User:Akshourya
[edit]- Akshourya (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)
User kept uploading non-free logos, disregarding the final warning. 0x0a (talk) 06:30, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
- My bad, my notifications weren't working, I will not do this again. I sincerely apologize for my actions. Akshourya (talk) 15:40, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
Done Blocked for a week. Yann (talk) 21:26, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
User:1926Bubi57
[edit]1926Bubi57 (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information)) Recent false 'own work' uploads after multiple warnings, including the last one. Romano1981 (talk) 14:15, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Done Blocked for a week. Yann (talk) 21:34, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Deletion dispute:File:Egyptian Labor Law No. 14 of 2025.pdf
[edit]Hello,
I am reporting a misunderstanding regarding the copyright status of File:Egyptian Labor Law No. 14 of 2025.pdf. The file is being nominated for deletion due to a lack of "permission," but under Article 141 of the Egyptian Intellectual Property Law No. 82 of 2002, all official government documents are in the Public Domain.
The law explicitly states in Article 141:
In addition, protection shall not cover the following:
(1) Official documents, whatever their source or target language, such as laws, regulations, resolutions and decisions, international conventions, court decisions, award of arbitrators
and decisions of administrative committees having judicial competence.
Supporting References:
- WIPO Lex: https://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/legislation/details/1301
- On-Wiki Copy of the Law (Page 53): File:Egyptian Intellectual Property_Law 82 of 2002.pdf
I have already added the correct license tag {{PD-Egypt-official}} to the file description. I request an administrator to review this evidence and close the deletion request as it fully complies with Commons policies.
Best regards, --مصطفى حماده (talk) 14:56, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Already done VRT has marked the appropriate permission as received. - Jmabel ! talk 21:30, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry (2)
[edit]- Attia.hakim (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information))
- Hakim Attia (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information))
- Kimo1981 (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information))
Block evasion. Evidence is the username similarities on the first two accounts and the rest from User:SteinsplitterBot/Previously deleted files:
Jonteemil (talk) 19:09, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
- Added one sock above.Jonteemil (talk) 21:15, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Done Two socks blocked, all files deleted. Yann (talk) 21:20, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Geravelez
[edit]- Geravelez (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information))
Reuploads a copyvio after final warning ({{End of copyvios}}). Jonteemil (talk) 19:25, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Comment The File:OcelotesU.jpg is approximately at the threshold of originality ... maybe a bit above. Taylor 49 (talk) 19:51, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Done Already blocked for a week. Yann (talk) 21:17, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Eroina David Moreno
[edit]- User: Eroina David Moreno (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)
- Reasons for reporting: COM:NOTHERE.
— 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 21:48, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Not done No edits since December 4, and before then, since April. Revisit if they return and have further problematic behavior. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:41, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Contest the indefblock of User:Gaty3000
[edit]- Gaty3000 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)
- Artur2077 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)
The user was indef-blocked immediately after had receiving their first formal warning {{File copyright status}}. This is too harsh obviously and only led them to create an new account User:Artur2077 (see Special:Diff/1139192686) to made a clean start. @Bedivere, Gaty3000, and Artur2077. -- 0x0a (talk) 11:29, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Comment I would reduce the block length, but creating a new account just after getting blocked is not OK. Yann (talk) 11:43, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
- Wouldn't mind shortening the block but sincerely the new account is making things worse. Bedivere (talk) 15:08, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
- @Artur2077 What do you make of this? Aren't you going to speak up for yourself? 0x0a (talk) 12:05, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
- All right, still no response from the blocked party. I agree to Yann's opinion. 0x0a (talk) 13:05, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
- @0x0a, just to make things a bit clear, clean start isn't available for users under active sanctions.
A clean start is not permitted if there are active bans, blocks, or sanctions in place against the old account.
Even if that indef was "harsh", they should've contested the block. Making a new account is block evasion, which makes things worse (rightly said by Bedivere). Shaan SenguptaTalk 13:56, 3 January 2026 (UTC)- @Shaan Sengupta That said, some new users may not be aware of our blocking policy And our block message box doesn't explicitly state that creating a new account during the block period is not allowed, which might lead them into an endless cycle of block and block evasion. I found it necessary to clearly state this rule in the block message box. 0x0a (talk) 11:58, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
- @0x0a, great suggestion. I have started a discussion. I think we can maybe do it. Please see Commons:Village pump/Proposals#Adding a thing in block notices. Shaan SenguptaTalk 14:10, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
- Quicker than me. Thank you. 0x0a (talk) 14:14, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
- @0x0a, great suggestion. I have started a discussion. I think we can maybe do it. Please see Commons:Village pump/Proposals#Adding a thing in block notices. Shaan SenguptaTalk 14:10, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
- Did Commons add a policy for clean starts? GMGtalk 14:03, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
- Not yet. We just borrowed this concept from En wp. 0x0a (talk) 14:18, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
- We all know that Commons:Sockpuppetry is a soft redirect to Meta:Sock puppetry which lists WP:SOCK in see also section. And tbh, only enwiki describes this topic the way it should be. That said, I am in no way am saying that means we should import enwiki policy here but if we want people to stop doing that, we better develop that page locally. And I quoted it only bcoz it was linked above. Shaan SenguptaTalk 14:27, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
- @Shaan Sengupta That said, some new users may not be aware of our blocking policy And our block message box doesn't explicitly state that creating a new account during the block period is not allowed, which might lead them into an endless cycle of block and block evasion. I found it necessary to clearly state this rule in the block message box. 0x0a (talk) 11:58, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Flagmasterhere
[edit]Flagmasterhere (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information))
I can't believe that this is a new account. Any opinions? Yann (talk) 16:15, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
- Likely flag LTA sock. Definitely not here to contribute constructively. Should be blocked ASAP. Geoffroi 19:25, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
- Possibly a sock of User:Jurisdrew. Geoffroi 19:45, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
- His upload of File:Flag of Cocos (Keeling) Islands.svg has "to avenge the old version" in the descripton. There are two deleted redirects in the log that an admin may want to check out to see what accounts edited the file that was previously there. Geoffroi 19:57, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
- Here's what this account is "avenging": Commons:Deletion requests/File:Flag of the Cocos (Keeling) Islands.svg. This may be a reupload of the file deleted by Abzeronow. Geoffroi 20:03, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Done OK, blocked. Yann (talk) 20:04, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
- @Yann or any other admin, I would say there is enough material on TP to revoke talk page access. The first time he called Yann evil should've been the end of it. Shaan SenguptaTalk 08:13, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
Done I thought I already did that. Yann (talk) 09:17, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
Done. I declined unblock request. Taivo (talk) 09:30, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
- @Yann or any other admin, I would say there is enough material on TP to revoke talk page access. The first time he called Yann evil should've been the end of it. Shaan SenguptaTalk 08:13, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
NOTHOST/sockpuppetry
[edit]- Taran Chowdhury (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information))
- Pion smmln (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information))
- Morsalin 1212 (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information))
- Mehedihasan2026 (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information))
- Alfinjaman2026 (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information))
All uploading out of scope files related to a Taran Chowdhury which likely is the individual behind all accounts. See also w:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Pion smmln/Archive and below from User:SteinsplitterBot/Previously deleted files:
Jonteemil (talk) 21:03, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Done} see Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Pion smmln. --Lymantria (talk) 08:19, 4 January 2026 (UTC)
WeatherWriter
[edit]"Well, you are just dumb then. Lol. WeatherWriter (talk) 03:18, 4 January 2026 (UTC)". I've resisted the temptation to take action myself so someone please may do something they consider appropriate in this case. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bedivere (talk • contribs) 04:12, 4 January 2026 (UTC)
- I apologize for the comment. I made it while being hot headed and worked up over a premature deletion currently under discussion at undeletion requests. Note, I was not alerted for this report and only discovered it after a comment was made by Bedivere on the undeletion discussion regarding reporting me. WeatherWriter (talk) 04:20, 4 January 2026 (UTC)
- I'm fine with the apology. --Bedivere (talk) 04:29, 4 January 2026 (UTC)
MaxxyFoxx
[edit]- MaxxyFoxx (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information))
Continues to upload COM:NETCOPYVIOs after having one prior block for it. Jonteemil (talk) 04:14, 4 January 2026 (UTC)
Done Blocked 3 months, copyvios deleted. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 06:01, 4 January 2026 (UTC)
File:Dragoljub "Drage" Nikodinoski in the army.jpg Repeated deletion nominations and targeting by user Jingiby
[edit]BEGIN moved from COM:AN - Jmabel ! talk 20:38, 4 January 2026 (UTC)
The user Jingiby[1] has repeatedly targeted multiple files I uploaded since 2023, including this one. Specific actions include:
Nominating several files for deletion, despite all being properly licensed and compliant with Commons policies.
Making threats to report me to administrators in relation to these uploads.
Making repeated edits on Macedonia-related pages that appear disruptive and have caused concern among other editors.
Evidence:
File deletion nomination: [2]
Related file deletion discussion: [3]
Edits to Macedonia-related page: [4]
This behavior demonstrates a pattern of targeting both my uploads and Macedonia-related content, rather than raising valid, file-specific policy concerns. Most affected files have been publicly visible since 2023 and meet Commons licensing requirements.
I respectfully request administrator oversight to prevent further disruption and to ensure that deletion processes and content discussions remain policy-based and constructive. Dime Dimeski (talk) 11:39, 4 January 2026 (UTC)
END moved from COM:AN - Jmabel ! talk 20:38, 4 January 2026 (UTC)
@Jingiby: - Jmabel ! talk 20:38, 4 January 2026 (UTC)
Convenience links for what is referred to above with blind URLs:
- File:Dragoljub "Drage" Nikodinoski in the army.jpg
- File:Dragoljub Nikodinoski in the army.jpg
- Revision history for File:Macedonian Y-Haplogroups.png
Jmabel ! talk 20:43, 4 January 2026 (UTC)
- Hello everyone and Happy New Year. I would like to object to the above accusations as completely groundless. On the contrary, I believe that the editor called User:Dime Dimeski is in violation. He repeatedly removed the template I have added, on which it is explicitly written not to be removed until the case is reviewed by an administrator. Otherwise, the genetic scheme in question still has no reliable academic source, and is based only on forums, private sites and the like. As for the 2 photos of the person called Dragoljub, the dates there were changed, but despite this it is still not clear who this person is and why he needs to appear on Wikimedia Commons. In addition, I suspect that User:Dime Dimeski uses a sock with which they edit only one and the same photos. I am talking about the editor called User:ΜΑΚΕΔΟΝΑΣ. Jingiby (talk) 04:52, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
- Dragoljub Nikodinoski is the son of WW2-partisan Category:Dimitrija Dime Nikodinoski according to Macedonian wiki. Note: I created that category after noticing that there are a number of files related to him. It looks like he received some kind of award for his participation in WW2 and was mentioned by name (at the minimum) in at least one book on the 1st Macedonian-Kosovo Proletarian Brigade, so that I'd say that Dimitrija is probably in project scope. As for the son Dragoljub, I also created a category for the sake of keeping all files in one place. While less notable than the father I'd still say the images are worth keeping for depicting things like 1970s military uniforms, school diplomas from North Macedonia, etc. The images have educational value even if the depicted guy doesn't. Nakonana (talk) 20:38, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
- As for the two users being socks, I don't know. ΜΑΚΕΔΟΝΑΣ has been active on mkwiki since December 2024. Dime Dimeski has been active on mkwiki since July 2023. From a quick look they both have edited the article on Dimitrija Dime Nikodinoski (partially on the same day a few hours apart, with one of them adding content and the other one removing content). Dime Dimeski has a much stronger focus on Dimitrija Dime Nikodinoski (only one other article edited) than ΜΑΚΕΔΟΝΑΣ who has edited several other articles on mkwiki. If they are socks, then they don't appear to be using the accounts in an abusive manner (e.g. they don't seem to try to sway discussions in their favor by using the accounts to vote twice, or anything like that). They could be just two Macedonian editors who are both interested in Dimitrija Dime Nikodinoski. Nakonana (talk) 21:04, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
W26
[edit]- W26 (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information))
Continues to upload copyvios despite two prior blocks. Jonteemil (talk) 23:21, 4 January 2026 (UTC)
- @Jonteemil: you don't seem to have notified the user of this discussion; I will do that. - Jmabel ! talk 01:30, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Done 6-month block (third offense). - Jmabel ! talk 00:18, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
Nekkidjohann (talk · contribs)
[edit]Exhibitionist, not here to edit constructively Dronebogus (talk) 11:44, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
Done. I deleted the last remaining upload. Block is currently not needed. Taivo (talk) 09:51, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Tkysoftware
[edit]Tkysoftware (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) - keeps uploading copyvio files despite warnings - Jcb (talk) 20:38, 7 January 2026 (UTC)