Jump to content

User talk:Velvet

Add topic
From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Latest comment: 1 day ago by QICbot in topic Quality Image Promotion (07 January 2026)
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Velvet!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | asturianu | azərbaycanca | Bahasa Banjar | català | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | Esperanto | euskara | estremeñu | français | Frysk | galego | hrvatski | Bahasa Indonesia | interlingua | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | Kiswahili | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | magyar | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | occitan | Plattdüütsch | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | rumantsch | Scots | shqip | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | Basa Sunda | suomi | svenska | Tagalog | Türkçe | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | Ирон | македонски | нохчийн | русский | српски / srpski | тоҷикӣ | українська | ქართული | Հայերեն | नेपाली | भोजपुरी | मराठी | हिन्दी | অসমীয়া | বাংলা | தமிழ் | മലയാളം | සිංහල | ไทย | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | မြန်မာဘာသာ | 한국어 | 日本語 | 中文 | 中文(台灣)‎ | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 粵語 | עברית | اردو | العربية | تۆرکجه | سنڌي | فارسی | +/−

Happy Holidays 2024/2025!

[edit]
One of the Three Wise Men/Kings/Magi with his camel, detail of the nativity scene in the Saint Peter and Paul church, Weil der Stadt ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴

Joyeux Noël!
Bonne année!

Hello Velvet,
thank you very much for your great contributions to Wikimedia Commons! All the best,
Aristeas (talk) 10:02, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
Reply

✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille au calice rue de trévise.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:51, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 7 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St andre service eaux rue d'alger.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tuxyso 15:09, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille 6 place simon vollant.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Rbrechko 09:44, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:43, 8 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St andre sous pont royal graffiti.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 09:15, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille 27 29 place louise de bettignies.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 09:14, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille 13 rue georges maertens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 01:29, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 9 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rocamadour vue cote.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 19:09, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 26 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille citadelle acces grand carre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 18:17, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 31 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille FCB place des ouvriers.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:40, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 3 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille cimetiere sud carre 14 siege.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality --Berthold Werner 17:36, 1 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 4 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
File:Lille garage rue de la vieille aventure.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille garage rue de la vieille aventure.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 21:26, 8 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille ZAC pepiniere rue du fg de roubaix.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Benjism89 17:17, 8 February 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 11 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille flandres pas 2 cadeaux.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:49, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille palais des beaux-arts reflet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Julian Herzog 11:56, 9 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille palais des beaux arts grille.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:33, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 12 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille halle st louis.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 08:00, 10 February 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille passage de la demi-lune.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 08:00, 10 February 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 13 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille pont rue belle-vue.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 17:37, 11 February 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille rue de tournai salon exterieur.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 09:22, 11 February 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 14 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille rue chaude riviere.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 22:07, 12 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille alma jacquet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:14, 12 February 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 15 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille nanar rue chaude riviere.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --AuHaidhausen 09:36, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille euralille rue de la chaude riviere.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nikride 09:20, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 16 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

File:Roubaix bebe crash.jpg

[edit]
File:Roubaix bebe crash.jpg has been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Grand-Duc (talk) 06:28, 22 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
File:Roubaix bebe crash.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roubaix bebe crash.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Btspurplegalaxy 03:39, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 24 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roubaix quai de wattrelos mur.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Rbrechko 13:03, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roubaix cafe de la bourse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ercé 10:03, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 25 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roubaix cheminee trato tlv.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nikride 08:27, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 26 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roubaix G la dalle bd gambetta.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nikride 08:56, 24 February 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 27 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

File:Lille garage rue de la vieille aventure.jpg

[edit]
File:Lille garage rue de la vieille aventure.jpg has been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 06:30, 27 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roubaix pont emile duhamel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nikride 08:05, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roubaix Love is quai de wattrelos.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:47, 25 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 28 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roubaix quai de lorient graffiti.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 17:32, 26 February 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roubaix pont emile duhamel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nikride 08:05, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roubaix Love is quai de wattrelos.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:47, 25 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 1 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille 49 rue des sarrazins.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 10:39, 27 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roubaix quai de wattrelos.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 10:39, 27 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 2 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille 84 90 rue des stations.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 08:47, 28 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille 65 rue de flandre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 08:47, 28 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 3 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille vue zenith pont.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 23:58, 1 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 4 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wattrelos carter-cash rue d'avelghem.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 10:51, 3 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 6 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

File:Lille fresque M-CITY.jpg

[edit]
File:Lille fresque M-CITY.jpg has been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:07, 11 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille maison rue st joseph - Flickr - Velvet 59.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Rbrechko 16:22, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 11 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

File:St andre rue gambetta mur graffiti.jpg

[edit]
File:St andre rue gambetta mur graffiti.jpg has been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 05:03, 12 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille place casquette.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Rbrechko 01:43, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 12 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

File:Roubaix la cave aux poetes rue du gd chemin.jpg

[edit]
File:Roubaix la cave aux poetes rue du gd chemin.jpg has been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:52, 27 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sainghin blockhaus de la courte.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Harlock81 19:20, 24 March 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anstaing blockhaus gruson sud.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 19:37, 24 March 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 27 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sainghin chemin d'anstaing pont A27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 16:42, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 29 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lambersart 2 4 place louise de bettignies.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 12:53, 28 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 31 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lambersart 12 16 rue louis braille.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:46, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lambersart 2 8 av de Viersen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:46, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 1 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lambersart 74 80 av président kennedy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 01:49, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sainghin clocher eglise.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 2 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lompret pont rue paul brame.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 09:25, 31 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille friterie chti'mi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 09:25, 31 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 3 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

File:Roubaix square camille claudel.jpg

[edit]
File:Roubaix square camille claudel.jpg has been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 08:01, 3 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Perenchies 5 7 residence victor hugo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 08:34, 1 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lompret vue gare.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 08:34, 1 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lambersart 13 19 rue du 8 mai 1945.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 20:28, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 4 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille av willy brandt distribox.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 10:26, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille 2 rue dumont d'urville.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 10:26, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anstaing chemin du marais pont rail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 07:36, 2 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anstaing chemin brasserie graffiti mur.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 07:36, 2 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 5 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille rang rue de la chaude riviere.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 07:46, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 6 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mouvaux 115 rue de roubaix.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 11:43, 4 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mouvaux 24 26 bd de la marne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 11:45, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 7 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mouvaux 30 rue de wasquehal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 12:09, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mouvaux 30 34 bd de la marne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 SupportOK --St. Krug 12:06, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 8 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mouvaux 173 rue de roubaix.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 09:58, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille rue darwin graffiti.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 10:01, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 9 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

File:Lille huitriere facade.JPG

[edit]
File:Lille huitriere facade.JPG has been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:06, 12 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mouvaux bat indus rue du congo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 08:18, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mouvaux 9 27 rue du congo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nikride 11:34, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 13 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tourcoing 157 161 rue du blanc seau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 08:05, 11 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tourcoing 32 20 rue des freres bruneel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 08:05, 11 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 14 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tourcoing mon morts blanc seau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:48, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tourcoing garage rue du congo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 08:53, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 15 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tourcoing quai de bordeaux.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 10:38, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 16 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Deulemont bord de deule bis.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 13:32, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Deulemont 2 rue st symphorien.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:54, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 19 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Deulemont chemin du garde champetre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:47, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Deulemont bord deule graffiti.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 15:37, 17 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 20 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Deulemont route de comines.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 08:03, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Deulemont pont pieton.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 08:03, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 21 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Deulemont vue port.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 21:00, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 23 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Deulemont vue etang.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 20:58, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Deulemont vue allee des jardins.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 20:58, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 24 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lambersart chateau bonte entree.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 08:26, 23 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lambersart chateau bonte face.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 08:26, 23 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 26 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lambersart parc des charmettes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 10:00, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lambersart cimetiere du bourg croix.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 10:00, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 29 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lambersart graffiti rue auguste bonte.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --TorinoDoc 08:49, 27 April 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lambersart piste skatepark.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 11:06, 27 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 30 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

File:Lille fives graffiti rue barni.jpg

[edit]
File:Lille fives graffiti rue barni.jpg has been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 10:34, 5 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille Euralille skema.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 08:00, 5 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille B&B rue berthe morisot.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 00:06, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 8 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille allee simone de beauvoir.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 13:05, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:47, 13 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille appart city rue berthe morisot.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The picture has an unpleasant blue cast in the upper part. Apparently, the lighting was unfavorable at the time of the photo. I also find the grid on the lawn annoying. But there seems to be nothing that could be done about that. -- Spurzem 11:31, 4 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for your review, new version a bit warmer uploaded. --Velvet 07:54, 5 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 08:04, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 16 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille salle sport Maryse bastie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
PC is needed a bit at left, the concrete wall is leaning. --Sebring12Hrs 08:42, 25 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for your review, new version uploaded. --Velvet 13:01, 25 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 15:23, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille place de gand.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 08:42, 25 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
 Support Good quality. --Tuxyso 08:43, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 28 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille periph camion.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 07:49, 26 May 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille 47 49 rue jenner.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 07:49, 26 May 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 29 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille 49 59 rue emile borel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 09:09, 27 May 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille rue du pont du lion d'or.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 09:09, 27 May 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 30 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sailly 21 rue du chateau neuf.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Romainbehar 09:42, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ronchin rue de l'universite.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 15:48, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 1 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sailly 4 6 rue deledalle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:34, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sailly 35 37 allee du charron.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:34, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ronchin rue st sauveur bout.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 23:26, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille rue mariotte.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 23:26, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 2 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sailly 15 rue du chateau neuf.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 11:24, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sailly 9 bis rue verte.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 11:24, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 3 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sailly 45bis rue trieu de meurchin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 07:37, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sailly 29 rue verte.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Harlock81 09:07, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 4 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sailly cafe de la mairie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 07:49, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sailly 53 rue de la mairie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Benjism89 10:01, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 6 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sailly rue de la couture.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 13:11, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sailly eglise st pierre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plánovací kalendář 08:14, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 7 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sailly salle clovis deffrenne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Lvova 10:41, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 8 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Willems 1 rue de sailly.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 07:55, 6 June 2025 (UTC)Reply
 Support Good quality. --Ziv 23:19, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Toufflers 96 rue de sailly.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 07:55, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sailly vue ferme meurchin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Romzig 12:36, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 9 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Willems etang 6 bonniers.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:08, 7 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Willems 32 rue d'hem.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:08, 7 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 10 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Croix cotonniere entree.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:25, 8 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Croix chateau eau rue de la gare.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:25, 8 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 11 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wasquehal 25 sentier des lauriers.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 10:37, 9 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wasquehal 2 rue des freres gonthier.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 10:37, 9 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 12 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wasquehal champ sentier du laurier.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 08:19, 10 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wasquehal av pierre mauroy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 08:19, 10 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 13 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

File:Lille graffiti JB Lebas.jpg

[edit]
File:Lille graffiti JB Lebas.jpg has been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:13, 14 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wasquehal eclusier du triest.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 07:54, 11 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wasquehal eclusier du plomeux.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 07:54, 11 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 14 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wasquehal phare.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Lvova 14:54, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wasquehal Paul.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:09, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wasquehal eclusier du triest.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 07:54, 11 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wasquehal eclusier du plomeux.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 07:54, 11 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 15 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haubourdin cite potie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 07:36, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haubourdin cargill rue gambetta.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 07:36, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 19 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Loos 27 29 rue JJ rousseau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 07:53, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille 59 rue destailleurs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 08:33, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 20 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haubourdin rue du general mesny cargill.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 08:55, 18 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 21 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Loos 152 rue mirabeau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 06:47, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Loos 41 les compagnons.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 06:47, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 22 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Loos chemin rue albert camus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 09:15, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Loos eglise ste anne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 09:15, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 23 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Loos UEROS lille rue lafargue.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 08:01, 21 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Loos confiserie femina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 11:30, 21 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 24 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Emmerin 10 rue roger salengro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 13:16, 22 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Emmerin 14 24 rue roger salengro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 13:16, 22 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 25 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Emmerin chemin de santes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 08:16, 23 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Emmerin jesus caritas rue victor hugo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 08:16, 23 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 26 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Houplin ancoisne arbres.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 08:07, 25 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Emmerin mairie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 06:49, 24 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haubourdin champ graminee.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 06:49, 24 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 11:37, 27 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Houplin ancoisne station epuration.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Benjism89 17:37, 26 June 2025 (UTC)Reply
 Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 18:15, 26 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 29 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santes silos port.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 11:26, 27 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santes entrepots arbres.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 11:36, 27 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 30 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille lycee faidherbe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 10:24, 28 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ronchin lycee gaston berger.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 10:24, 28 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Houplin ancoisne canteraine chemin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 09:30, 28 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 1 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

File:Lille fives graffiti degeyter.jpg

[edit]
File:Lille fives graffiti degeyter.jpg has been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 08:29, 13 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

File:Lille fives graffiti losc.jpg

[edit]
File:Lille fives graffiti losc.jpg has been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 08:29, 13 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille cours st so entree.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 17:06, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille bd paul painleve reverbere.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 17:06, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 25 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille monument victimes 18 ponts.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:19, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille hotel de ville place simon vollant.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Too soft IMHO --Poco a poco 08:20, 23 July 2025 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for your review. Brighter, more contrasted version uploaded. --Velvet 10:49, 23 July 2025 (UTC)Reply
 Support Good quality. The first version was already ok to me. --Sebring12Hrs 12:02, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 26 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille st so halle A.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 09:05, 24 July 2025 (UTC)Reply
 Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 09:15, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille rue de valenciennes fenetre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 09:05, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 27 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Menin schelpenstraat 99.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 08:56, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Menin eglise maagd der armen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 08:56, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 28 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Menin vagevuurstraat 29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:39, 26 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Menin vagevuurstraat 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 12:34, 26 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 29 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mouscron ch du risquons tout de gaulle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 11:40, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 30 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mouscron rue de la blommerie 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 09:16, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mouscron eglise JC face.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 09:16, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 31 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille cite st maurice entree.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 14:24, 30 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille monument fusilles.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 14:24, 30 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 2 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille 48 70 rue du ballon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 11:24, 31 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille reservoir st maurice.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 11:24, 31 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 3 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mons 372 av gen de gaulle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 13:18, 1 August 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille usine elevatoire refection.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 12:13, 1 August 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 4 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mons residence les bruyeres.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 09:17, 2 August 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mons rue du bearn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 09:17, 2 August 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille rue des augustins graffiti.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 09:23, 2 August 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 5 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mons rue general de gaulle cuves.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 11:52, 3 August 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille cite st maurice int.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 11:52, 3 August 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 6 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

File:Lille sechoir friche Montpellier graffiti.jpg

[edit]
File:Lille sechoir friche Montpellier graffiti.jpg has been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 14:50, 7 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille rue de bruxelles spada.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
What about FoP for modern art in France? --Екатерина Борисова 03:20, 2 August 2025 (UTC)Reply
 Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 21:13, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 11 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille rue camille guerin graffiti.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:59, 12 August 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille dir des finances.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 16:58, 12 August 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 15 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille PdBA cour.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --AuHaidhausen 08:11, 13 August 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 16 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marquette 3 15 rue des tilleuls.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 09:59, 15 August 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille graffiti rue d'alger.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 09:59, 15 August 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille rues littre constantine.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 10:54, 15 August 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille rue littre garages.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 10:54, 15 August 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille immeubles rue paul duez.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 11:27, 15 August 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:46, 18 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marquette rond point rue de quesnoy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 07:29, 16 August 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marquette maison de la famille.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 07:26, 16 August 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 19 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marquette 1 25 rue vandermeersch.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 08:48, 17 August 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marquette rue des platanes voies.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 08:48, 17 August 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:44, 20 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bondues parking abbe six.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 15:16, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bondues croix blanche entree.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 14:37, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 7 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Linselles clocher pasteur.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:42, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bondues institution croix blanche.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 07:28, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:43, 8 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille bd docteur calmette.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 12:29, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Linselles vierge puissante.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. May be better with reduced midtone lights. --XRay 12:29, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 9 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Le concours Wiki Loves Monuments revient en France en 2025 !

[edit]

Bonjour !

Vous recevez ce message car vous avez participé à l'édition 2021 du concours de Wiki Loves Monuments en France et nous serions ravis que vous y participiez à nouveau cette année !

Après quatre longues années d'absence, le concours est de retour en France !

Toutes les informations sont disponibles sur la page dédiée : Wiki Loves Monuments 2025 en France. L'objectif du concours est toujours le même : photographier le patrimoine historique. Les monuments admissibles sont les monuments architecturaux (présents dans la base Mérimée) et les objets (dans la base Palissy), qu'ils soient classés, inscrits ou simplement inventoriés.

N'hésitez pas à soumettre vos photos du 15 septembre au 15 octobre inclus. Nous sommes disponibles si vous avez la moindre question.

Bonne participation !

Au nom de l'équipe d'organisation, VIGNERON (talk), 9 septembre 2025

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bondues aerodrome pistes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 09:16, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tourcoing masurel av amsterdam.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Benjism89 08:52, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:44, 10 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bondues beach volley aerodrome.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 08:00, 8 September 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bondues aire jeux aerodrome.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 08:00, 8 September 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:46, 11 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marcq pave strategique geldrive.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 11:13, 9 September 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bondues hangar stratus club.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 11:13, 9 September 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:46, 12 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille rue saint sebastien.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 11:34, 10 September 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille quai des chevillards.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:28, 10 September 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 13 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Annœullin place gen de gaulle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Giles Laurent 18:26, 11 September 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Annœullin 580 rue jean carpentier.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 18:14, 11 September 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 14 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Don casemate 209.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 08:53, 12 September 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Don bord de deule.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 08:53, 12 September 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 15 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2024 voting is open!

[edit]
2023 Picture of the Year: Incense plays an important role in Vietnamese life. It is considered as a sacred bridge to connect the visible life of human beings and the world of heaven, earth, and gods. Photo taken in Quang Phu Cau village, on the outskirts of Hanoi, Vietnam. In this picture, incense sticks are being set out to dry, after being dipped in the incense solution.

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2024 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year is the nineteenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2024) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and top 5% of most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2023 Picture of the Year contest.

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Provin 6 14 rue charles vion.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 16:22, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Don O King Kong.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:52, 14 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Don voie procession champ.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Lvova 21:49, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 17 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Provin rue charles vion passage.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 08:22, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Provin cimetiere tombes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Rangan Datta Wiki 07:53, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 18 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Provin salle des fetes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nylki 08:13, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 19 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lauwe chemin Dronckaertstraat.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 19:07, 17 September 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lauwe bord de lys.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Lvova 18:18, 17 September 2025 (UTC)Reply
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 19:07, 17 September 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Don etang louviere.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 23:13, 17 September 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 20 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lauwe chemin bord de lys.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 08:51, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lauwe chemin autoroute E403.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 08:51, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 21 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lauwe lauwbergstraat 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 09:40, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lauwe larstraat 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 09:40, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 23 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lauwe menenstraat 110.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 07:51, 21 September 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lauwe menenstraat 30 40.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Milseburg 10:30, 21 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 24 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tourcoing poste gustave dron.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Rangan Datta Wiki 15:07, 25 September 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tourcoing 54 56 rue nationale.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 15:28, 25 September 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 28 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2024 voting is open!

[edit]

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you previously voted in the Picture of the Year contest. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2024) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2024.

Round 2 will end at UTC.

Click here to vote now! If you have already voted for Round 2, please ignore this message.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santes l escale.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:08, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santes cite wallaert.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 19:59, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 5 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tourcoing 106 rue de lille.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 09:39, 3 October 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tourcoing le croise louis lenoir.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 09:39, 3 October 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 6 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wavrin cimetiere allemand.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:19, 4 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wavrin chemin du bois de la rive.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Harlock81 10:37, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 7 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wavrin vue cimetiere.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 10:11, 5 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
 Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 10:17, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 8 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille bd pasteur nanar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 16:36, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille bancs rue des poissonceaux.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 16:36, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:52, 13 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Courtrai burgemeester margostraat 25B.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 08:33, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Courtrai blauwkasteelstraat.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 17:43, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 14 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lauwe gare.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality; P.S. I would choose 16:9 to get the building more present. --2015 Michael 2015 09:12, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 15 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lauwe kleine molenstraat.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:25, 13 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Courtrai le sjouwer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:45, 16 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille rue des jardins bebe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 17:48, 1 November 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille place des archives.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 17:48, 1 November 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 4 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille hotel avelin cote jardin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 09:27, 2 November 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille rue st andre miss tic.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 09:26, 2 November 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:45, 5 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Leers nord chemin canal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:34, 3 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Leers bord canal heron.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:34, 3 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 6 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haubourdin cargill entree.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 09:05, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wattrelos vue station epuration grimonpont.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 09:06, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 7 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haubourdin cite ste eugenie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 18:38, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haubourdin vieux canal table.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 18:38, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 8 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haubourdin necropole nationale.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Romzig 20:29, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:43, 9 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Modernisme

[edit]

Salut, Attention à ne pas confondre le modernisme et le contemporain, ce bâtiment n'a rien de moderniste. Amicalement Arflhn (talk) 14:09, 9 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Bonjour,
En effet, le style est difficile à qualifier... Il s'agit d'une ancienne ferme restructurée et reconvertie en logements. Peut-être post-moderne ? Bonne journée. Velvet (talk) 08:38, 10 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haubourdin rue gen mesny lycee.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 09:27, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haubourdin rue de la tannerie cheminee.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JackyM59 11:02, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haubourdin port de santes mouettes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 12:53, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 10 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haubourdin 25 31 rue des fusilles.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:54, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Emmmerin rang rue de la canteraine.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 10:20, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 11 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haubourdin ancien canal deule.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 14:15, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haubourdin 2 12 allee de la cingle jolee.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 10:15, 9 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 12 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haubourdin 12 14 allee du gros chene.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 09:19, 10 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 13 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haubourdin av de lattre garages.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 08:27, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haubourdin allee gros chene 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 08:27, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 14 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haubourdin place des acacias.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 11:32, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santes av de l amitie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 08:34, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 15 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Town hall of Gouville-sur-Mer (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 16 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santes rue jean jaures passage M341.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 08:22, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santes chemin rue jean jaures voies.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
@Velvet: , good, one spot to remove, I added imagenote --Gower 09:16, 13 November 2025 (UTC)Reply
✓ Done Thank you for the hint. --Velvet 12:59, 13 November 2025 (UTC)Reply
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 18:58, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 16 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion (16 November 2025)

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haubourdin arbuste voies.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 09:53, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santes rue jean jaures voies.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 09:53, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santes rue jean jaures passage M341.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 08:22, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santes chemin rue jean jaures voies.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
@Velvet: , good, one spot to remove, I added imagenote --Gower 09:16, 13 November 2025 (UTC)Reply
✓ Done Thank you for the hint. --Velvet 12:59, 13 November 2025 (UTC)Reply
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 18:58, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 15:37, 16 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion (18 November 2025)

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bouvines cimetiere.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 17:31, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 18 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion (19 November 2025)

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bouvines ferme courte chemin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 11:55, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bouvines eglise vue.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 11:55, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 19 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated contents should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Günther Frager (talk) 14:00, 19 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion (20 November 2025)

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bouvines passage deffontaines.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 09:20, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 20 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion (21 November 2025)

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bouvines rue felix dehau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 09:47, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bouvines route de louvil voies.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 09:47, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 21 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Valued image promotion

[edit]
An image you created has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you created was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Au chat barré, ancien estaminet avenue du Peuple Belge (Lille).

-- Gower (talk) 10:46, 22 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Valued image promotion

[edit]
An image you created has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you created was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Immeuble, 31 rue de Gand (Lille).

-- Gower (talk) 10:56, 22 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Valued image promotion

[edit]
An image you created has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you created was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hôtel du Juge Garde des Monnaies, Lille.

-- Gower (talk) 11:03, 22 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion (24 November 2025)

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bouvines rue st hubert ferme.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Romzig 21:39, 21 November 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 24 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion (26 November 2025)

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bouvines rue st hubert passage.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality, well composed --Gower 07:47, 23 November 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:52, 26 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion (02 December 2025)

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! La madeleine centre romarin bis.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 20:23, 29 November 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 2 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
An image you created has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you created was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
La Voix du Nord building in Lille, facade.

Gower (talk) 05:26, 3 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion (05 December 2025)

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille av president hoover.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:53, 1 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
 Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 06:37, 2 December 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:43, 5 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion (06 December 2025)

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! La madeleine rue Konrad Adenauer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 20:36, 3 December 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:43, 6 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion (08 December 2025)

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Blandain institut notre dame.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 19:26, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Blandain cimetiere.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 19:26, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 8 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion (09 December 2025)

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Blandain topiaire rue de la souvenance 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 11:25, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Blandain rue de la souvenance maison.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality --FlocciNivis 11:25, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 9 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion (10 December 2025)

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tournai etab dumortier.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 13:17, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tournai chateau lassus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Strong support I love the composition, lighting, and the quality of this image. --Wobbanight 12:18, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 10 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion (12 December 2025)

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tournai hameau du cocriamont maison.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 22:39, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 12 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion (13 December 2025)

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Blandain rue des deportes de blandain.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Pangalau 16:47, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Blandain champs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Pangalau 16:47, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 13 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

File:Lille graffiti maisons rue du fg de roubaix.jpg

[edit]
File:Lille graffiti maisons rue du fg de roubaix.jpg has been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 06:42, 13 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

File:Lille fives rue boldoduc graffiti 1.jpg

[edit]
File:Lille fives rue boldoduc graffiti 1.jpg has been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 06:46, 13 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion (18 December 2025)

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tournai hameau du cocriamont chapelle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 18:14, 15 December 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:46, 18 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

File:Lille rue louis faure graffiti.jpg

[edit]
File:Lille rue louis faure graffiti.jpg has been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 02:49, 21 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

File:Tourcoing la tossee mur graffiti.jpg

[edit]
File:Tourcoing la tossee mur graffiti.jpg has been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 02:52, 21 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Happy holidays! * 2026 !

[edit]
  * Happy Holidays! * 
  • Merry Christmas and a happy New Year!
  • ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
  • Joyeux Noël et bonne année!
  • Frohe Weihnachten und ein glückliches Neues Jahr!
  • Wesołych Świąt i Szczęśliwego Nowego Roku!
  • Щасливого Різдва i з Новим роком!
  • Boldog karácsonyt és boldog új évet!
  • Καλά Χριστούγεννα και καλή χρονιά!

   -- George Chernilevsky talk 16:09, 21 December 2025 (UTC)   Reply

Quality Image Promotion (23 December 2025)

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Carvin rang rue des herons.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 10:13, 20 December 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille av Willy Brandt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 10:13, 20 December 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 23 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Merry Christmas ...

[edit]
* ...and a happy new year!, Velvet! *
  • ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
  • Joyeux Noël et bonne année!
  • Frohe Weihnachten und ein glückliches Neues Jahr!
  • Wesołych Świąt i Szczęśliwego Nowego Roku!
  • Счастливого Рождества и c Новым годом!
  • Щасливого Різдва i З Новим роком!
  • Boldog karácsonyt és boldog új évet!
  • 聖誕快樂,新年快樂!
  • Καλά Χριστούγεννα και καλή χρονιά!


Ermell (talk) 11:18, 23 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion (24 December 2025)

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Toulouse capitole R.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Igor123121 19:03, 21 December 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille 30 rue albert samain decor.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 09:27, 21 December 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Carvin terril 107.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. But: IMO an aspect ratio of 3:1 or 2:1 would be better. --XRay 09:27, 21 December 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 24 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion (25 December 2025)

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille rue de wazemmes bd victor hugo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --DimiTalen 08:52, 22 December 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille cite delmar entree.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 09:16, 22 December 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:47, 25 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

File:Graffiti sur le chemin du halage zone du bras mort à Wasquehal(1).jpg has been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 04:44, 26 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

File:Graffiti sur le chemin du halage zone du bras mort à Wasquehal(2).jpg has been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 04:44, 26 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion (04 January 2026)

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille JB lebas jeux.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 18:35, 1 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille moyenne deule bord.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:21, 1 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 4 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion (05 January 2026)

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Premesques eglise st laurent.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 10:00, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Premesques casemate.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 09:59, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:46, 5 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion (06 January 2026)

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Premesques vue eglise.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Espandero 09:10, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Premesques mairie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Espandero 09:10, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:53, 6 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion (07 January 2026)

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ennetieres recolte betterave.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:47, 4 January 2026 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:47, 7 January 2026 (UTC)Reply